If you don't see your institution, add your dataset to the main dataverse named "RepOD".
Select the dataverse to which you want to add the new dataset:
You need to Sign In/Sign Up to add a dataset.
Share this dataset on your favorite social media networks.
Stefańska, Barbara, 2026, "Forage - nutrition value of alfalfa silage", https://doi.org/10.18150/KLTHZB, RepOD, V2
Learn about Data Citation Standards.
The aim of the study was to determine the effect of ensiling alfalfa with different degrees of cell wall lignification with fibrolytic enzymes on the quality and nutritional value, as well as in vitro ruminal digestibility of dry matter and neutral detergent fibre. The experimental material consisted of forage from four alfalfa varieties, including two traditional, high-lignin (Dymitra, Gea) and two with reduced lignin content (Bluemilk, Legendairy). The experimental material was ensiled in the following experimental design: control (0, without enzyme additives) and experimental groups: ×1 dose of enzyme additives and five (×5), ten (×10), and twenty-fold (×20) higher doses. Forage samples from four alfalfa varieties were analyzed for nutritional value (dry matter, crude fiber and its fractions, including neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, and acid detergent lignin). Further evaluation criteria of alfalfa silage included: nutritional value (the above analyses) along with the content of crude protein and its fractions according to the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System (CNCPS) v 6.5 model, quality (pH, ammonia nitrogen, lactic acid, and volatile fatty acids), and in vitro ruminal degradation of dry matter and neutral detergent fiber. The experiment was performed from 2024 to 2026 yr. Microsoft Excel spreadsheets containing all empirical data collected during the experiment were saved in .xlsx format. Files saved in .lst format from the SAS statistical program can be opened using Notepad.
alfalfa, structural carbohydrates, forage preservation, in vitro rumen degradability
2029-05-24
This dataset is under embargo. Files in this dataset will be available from 2029-05-24.
Are you sure you want to delete this dataset and all of its files? You cannot undelete this dataset.
According to the current settings, files in this dataset will be available from 2029-05-24.
Are you sure you want to lift the embargo?
Once you lift the embargo, you will not be able to set it again.
Are you sure you want to delete this draft version? Files will be reverted to the most recently published version. You cannot undelete this draft.
Use a Anonymized Private URL to allow those without Dataverse accounts to access your dataset. For more information about the Private URL feature, please refer to the User Guide.
Private URL has not been created.
"WARNING. This dataset has at least one published version. Those who have access to the Anonymized Private URL for this dataset may be able to use its accessible metadata to look up the full, not anonymized version of this dataset.
Are you sure you want to disable the Private URL? If you have shared the Private URL with others they will no longer be able to use it to access your dataset.
Use a Private URL to allow those without Dataverse accounts to access your dataset. For more information about the Private URL feature, please refer to the User Guide.
You will not be able to make changes to this dataset while it is in review.
This dataset cannot be published until Agriculture and Horticulture is published. Would you like to publish both right now?
Once you publish this dataset it must remain published.
Are you sure you want to republish this dataset?
Select if this is a minor or major version update.
This dataset cannot be published until Agriculture and Horticulture is published by its administrator.
This dataset cannot be published until Agriculture and Horticulture and Poznań University of Life Sciences are published.
Are you sure you want to deaccession? The selected version(s) will no longer be viewable by the public.
Please fill this out to prove you are not a robot.
