If you don't see your institution, add your dataset to the main dataverse named "RepOD".
Select the dataverse to which you want to add the new dataset:
You need to Sign In/Sign Up to add a dataset.
Share this dataset on your favorite social media networks.
Mrozowska, Sylwia Maria; Jan A. Wendt; Bartosz Duraj; Agnieszka Bógdał-Brzezińska, 2024, "Energy poverty in Poland: scale analysis and differentiation on the example of the communes of Augustów County", https://doi.org/10.18150/SRMVLW, RepOD, V1
Learn about Data Citation Standards.
Celem podjętych przez autorów badań była analiza czynników i określenie zasięgu ubóstwa energetycznego w gospodarstwach domowych na wybranym obszarze - tj. w powiecie augustowskim. Drugim celem badania było zwrócenie uwagi na fakt, że wybór metody badawczej i przyjęte kryteria mogą prowadzić do istotnie dużych rozbieżności w wynikach, co może determinować wybór metody badania przez czynniki polityczno-ekonomiczne. W celu zweryfikowania hipotezy o większym zasięgu ubóstwa energetycznego w gminach wiejskich niż miejskich posłużono się m.in. Metody: w badaniu wykorzystano obliczenia statystyczne oraz analizę obszernej literatury dotyczącej definicji i teorii pomiaru ubóstwa. Wyniki: badanie wykazało przestrzenne zróżnicowanie ubóstwa energetycznego w badanym powiecie (27,85%) i w jego gminach. W mieście Augustów wyniosło ono 11,00%, a w gminie Płaska, o najwyższym poziomie ubóstwa, ponad 64,00%. Wnioski: Wybrana metoda badawcza, oparta o ustawową definicję ubóstwa energetycznego, istotnie ogranicza występowanie zjawiska w porównaniu z innymi metodami. W literaturze nie osiągnięto konsensusu co do definicji ubóstwa energetycznego. Doprowadziło to do przyjęcia różnych metod i kryteriów badania, co skutkuje znacznymi różnicami w określaniu jego skali, utrudniając tym samym prowadzenie polityki wsparcia dla gospodarstw domowych.
The aim of the research undertaken by the authors was to analyze the factors and determine the extent of energy poverty in households in the selected area — i.e., Augustów County. The second aim of the study was to highlight that the choice of the research method and the criteria adopted may lead to significantly large discrepancies in the results, which may determine the choice of the survey method by political and economic factors. The following were used in order to verify the hypothesis of a great-er extent of energy poverty in rural than in urban communes. Methods: the research used statistical calculation and analysis of the extensive literature on definitions and theories of poverty measurement. Results: the research showed spatial variation in energy poverty in the studied county (27.85%) and in its communes. In the town of Augustów, it was 11.00%, and in the commune of Płaska, with the highest poverty level, it reached over 64.00%. Conclusions: The research method chosen, based on the statutory definition of energy poverty, significantly reduces the incidence of the phenomenon compared to other methods. No consensus has been reached in the literature on the definition of energy poverty. This has led to the adoption of different methods and criteria for the study, resulting in significant differences in determining its scale, thereby obstructing the pursuit of support policies for households.
Augustów County, commune, definition, energy poverty (EP), energy transition, objective factors, Poland, measuring method
Wendt, Jan Andrzej, i in. „Energy Poverty in Poland: Scale Analysis and Differentiation on the Example of the Communes of Augustów County”. Barometr Regionalny, t. 19, 1, 2023, s. 51–65, https://doi.org/10.56583/br.2188. http://dx.doi.org/10.56583/br.2188 doi:
CC BY - Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
Please select a file or files to be deleted.
The file(s) will be deleted after you click on the Delete button.
Files will not be removed from previously published versions of the dataset.
Please select a file or files to be edited.
For selected file(s) set a license to
Please select a file or files to be downloaded.
Please select a file or files for access request.
Please select restricted file(s) to be unrestricted.
You need to Log In/Sign Up to request access to this file.
Please confirm and/or complete the information needed below in order to continue.
Asterisks indicate required fields
Access to file(s) subject to additional consent under following conditions:
The restricted file(s) selected may not be downloaded because you have not been granted access.
Click Continue to download the files you have access to download.
Are you sure you want to delete this dataset and all of its files? You cannot undelete this dataset.
Are you sure you want to lift the embargo?
Once you lift the embargo, you will not be able to set it again.
Are you sure you want to delete this draft version? Files will be reverted to the most recently published version. You cannot undelete this draft.
Use a Private URL to allow those without Dataverse accounts to access your dataset. For more information about the Private URL feature, please refer to the User Guide.
Private URL has not been created.
Are you sure you want to disable the Private URL? If you have shared the Private URL with others they will no longer be able to use it to access your dataset.
You will not be able to make changes to this dataset while it is in review.
This dataset cannot be published until University of Gdańsk is published. Would you like to publish both right now?
Once you publish this dataset it must remain published.
Are you sure you want to republish this dataset?
Select if this is a minor or major version update.
This dataset cannot be published until University of Gdańsk is published by its administrator.
This dataset cannot be published until University of Gdańsk and RepOD are published.
Are you sure you want to deaccession? The selected version(s) will no longer be viewable by the public.
Contact person for this dataset, having substantive knowledge of the data
Please fill this out to prove you are not a robot.
